cabirc
coalition against bullingdon immigration removal centre

public reaction and opinion

14th February 2002: Yarl's Wood detention centre, near Bedford, was destroyed when detainees protested. Hunger strikes, fires and escapes are already the pattern at Campsfield detention centre (216 beds), some 15 miles from the proposed Bullingdon centre.

"It is time the Government got to grips with the problems at Campsfield and sorted them out - before the tinderbox really explodes. We don't need reminding that another immigration centre is being planned near Bicester - can we expect double trouble when that is built?" 
- Oxford Mail, 16 June 2008

Concern has been expressed locally, nationally and internationally. In September 2008 Thomas Hammarberg, the Human Rights Commissioner of the Council of Europe, expressed his concern at the British Government's plans to expand immigration detention facilities.

In July 2008 the Independent Asylum Commission published its report
Deserving Dignity in which it argues that the British public supports the concept of providing sanctuary to those fleeing persecution.  An opinion poll carried out for the Independent Asylum Commission indicated that 70 % believe people should not be detained unless they have committed a crime or posed a threat to society.

The Centre for Social Justice, which is chaired by Iain Duncan Smith, MP and former leader of the Conservative Party, has added its criticism to Government's policy of expanding the detention estate.

A report by the Centre's Asylum and Destitution Working Group,
Asylum Matters, published in December 2008 argues that the Britain's lack of success in persuading failed asylum seekers to return home voluntarily is part of a broader policy failure.  It argues for a complete overhaul of the system as current strategies are not working. It suggests more supportive and less punitive measures are likely to be more appropriate.

"The vast majority of asylum seekers currently detained do not pose a threat to security and studies suggest there is little risk of absconding.  However, the Government feels that it is in the interests of the country to detain large numbers of asylum seekers for long periods at great expense to the taxpayer, and it is currently in the process of planning an increase in the capacity of the detention estate.  We think this is an unnecessary waste of money.  We recommend that alternatives to detention are implemented such as bail bonds and voice recognition reporting…."